📅 Last updated: 8 May 2026
· 🏷 Topic: ETF, portfolio, diversification
· 🇧🇪 For: Belgian investors
A frequently asked question from Belgian beginners: how many ETFs should I buy? 5? 10? 20? The answer is almost always: fewer than you think.
The short version
For most long-term portfolios, one to three ETFs are enough. More ETFs does not give more diversification — often only more overlap.
Three worked examples
1 ETF (simplest):
- VWCE or FWIA (FTSE All-World) — global equities, developed + emerging markets in a single fund.
- ~3,700 underlying positions.
- No rebalancing needed.
- One click per monthly purchase.
For anyone who wants absolute simplicity: this is enough. No shame in it.
2 ETFs:
- IWDA (88%) + EIMI (12%) — developed markets + emerging markets separately.
- Advantage: lower TOB on IWDA (0.12% vs 1.32% on VWCE).
- Disadvantage: you need to rebalance between the two once a year.
3 ETFs (advanced):
- IWDA (75%) + EIMI (12%) + small-cap ETF (13%).
- Adds a small-cap tilt — smaller companies that historically deliver slightly better returns over the long term.
- More work, marginal added value for most retail investors.
What you do NOT want
Mistake: 5 funds that do the same thing.
A common beginner mistake is a portfolio of:
- VWCE (world)
- IUSA (S&P 500)
- ESI0 (Eurostoxx)
- BEL 20 tracker
- Nasdaq 100
Sounds diversified. It isn’t. VWCE already contains ~62% US, ~13% European. Adding an S&P 500 doubles your US exposure. Adding a Nasdaq doubles your US tech exposure. Adding a Eurostoxx doubles your Europe exposure. Result: more concentration, not less.
What the math says
Studies show that ~30 randomly selected stocks are enough to diversify away most company-specific risk — what remains is systemic risk (the market itself), which you cannot diversify away by adding more names.
A world-index ETF has 1,300–3,700 positions — well above that diversification threshold. A second world ETF adds barely anything if the two track the same index.
What CAN justify extra ETFs
- Asset-class diversification — an equity ETF + a bond ETF + a real-estate ETF represent different sources of risk. That is real diversification.
- Geographic tilt — for example, extra emerging markets if you expect them to grow structurally faster.
- Factor tilt — value, quality, small-cap as added “flavour” on top of a world base.
Practical recommendation
Start with one world-index ETF. Add a bond ETF when you want a more defensive profile (typically 30+, or as your horizon shortens). Add a real-estate ETF (GVV) or an EM ETF only if you have a specific reason — not “for the diversification”.
💡 Simplicity scales. One ETF in your portfolio is not amateurism. It is often the most robust choice for anyone who wants to stay disciplined for 30 years.
Sources
- Wikifin — Diversification and ETFs
- SPIVA Europe — Active vs passive study
- Curvo — Best ETF for Belgium 2026
